BeatXP: Modeling a 3.2x ROAS on a Simulated Rs30L Campaign
A breakdown of my MyCaptain capstone: the funnel, creative testing, and bid strategy behind a modeled 3.2x ROAS and 18% lower CPL for a smartwatch launch.
On this page
For my MyCaptain capstone I built a full paid-media plan for BeatXP's Flare Pro Smartwatch: a simulated Rs30L budget across Meta and Google, modeled to a 3.2x ROAS and an 18% lower cost per lead. It was a coursework simulation, not a live client account, but the planning, structure, and math are exactly how I approach a real launch. Here is how it came together.
The brief
BeatXP was launching the Flare Pro Smartwatch into a saturated wearables category where prior campaigns hovered around a 1.4x ROAS. The goal I set: model a plan that could realistically clear 3x ROAS on a Rs30L budget across Meta and Google in an eight-week window, without leaning on discounting to buy the numbers.
Funnel architecture
I split the budget across three stages so each rupee had a job:
- Awareness: broad interest targeting plus 1% lookalikes on Meta, and Display plus YouTube on Google, to seed a retargeting pool.
- Consideration: retargeting engagers and site visitors with proof-led creative (specs, comparisons, reviews).
- Conversion: custom audiences and Advantage+ Shopping on Meta, Search plus Performance Max on Google, where the intent and the budget weight were highest.
Search and PMax carried the conversion load; Display and YouTube existed to fill the top of the funnel, not to be judged on last-click ROAS.
Creative testing
Creative is where most performance budgets quietly leak, so I built a 4x3 testing matrix: four hook angles (price, feature, social proof, aspiration) across three formats (single image, carousel, video reel). Each variant had rotation triggers tied to CTR and CPM, so fatigued creative got cut before it dragged the account average down.
Budget and bid discipline
The plan modeled dynamic budget reallocation every 72 hours based on ROAS and CPA thresholds: scale what clears the bar, trim what does not. On Google, Target CPA bidding paired with negative-keyword hygiene and audience-signal enrichment kept spend on qualified intent. The 18% modeled CPL reduction came almost entirely from this discipline, killing underperforming ad sets quickly rather than hoping they would recover.
The modeled results
| Metric | Prior benchmark | Modeled |
|---|---|---|
| ROAS | 1.4x | 3.2x |
| CPL | baseline | -18% |
| Budget | Rs30L simulated across Meta + Google |
To be clear on scope: these are modeled projections from a capstone media plan, delivered as a full Notion build, not live-account results. What is real is the method, and it is the same method I would run on a live budget.
What actually transfers
The spreadsheet is disposable. The system is not: give every stage of the funnel a distinct job, test creative on a fixed matrix instead of on vibes, and reallocate budget on a schedule so winners scale and losers die fast. That loop is what turns a saturated-category launch from 1.4x into 3x-plus.
Planning a launch or trying to lift a paid account that has plateaued? Here is how I work.
Further reading
Deeper dives on the pieces above, from my Marketing Academy:
Keep reading
GEO and AEO: How to Get Your Brand Cited in AI Answers
Search is splitting in two. Here is the practical playbook I use to get brands cited inside ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews, not just ranked on page one.
Why I Build My Own SEO Tools (and When You Should Too)
I have shipped 40+ marketing tools in Python and TypeScript. Here is why a marketer learning to code is the highest-leverage move in SEO right now, and how to decide when to build.